creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Dick Morris
Dick Morris
20 Mar 2010
If Obamacare Passes, What Will Happen by Election Day?

If the House Democratic majority passes Obama's health care proposals, one of two things will happen by … Read More.

17 Mar 2010
Obama's Plan to Cripple Education Reforms

To date, the only area in which we have found ourselves in agreement with President Obama was over his … Read More.

10 Mar 2010
The Democrats' Pickett's Charge

And now the House Democrats line up at the instruction of their blind commanders for a final charge into … Read More.

How Much Obamacare Costs the Average Family

Whether or not you now have health insurance, Obama's health care bill will cost you dearly.

If you don't have insurance, you will be required to buy it. The legislation specifies how much you will have to pay for the coverage before any subsidy kicks in. All during the campaign, Obama kept speaking about affordable coverage. Now it appears that his definition of “affordable” might be a bit elastic.

If your household income is $66,000 a year, slightly above the national average, Obama's health care bill will require you to spend 12 percent of your income — about $8,000 a year or almost $700 a month — to buy health insurance before you get any federal subsidy.

Even those making less will have to reach deep into their meager resources to satisfy Obama's statutory requirement. Families scraping by on only $44,0000 a year will have to pay 7 percent of their income (about $3,000) on insurance. Even those making just $33,000 will have to ante up 4.5 percent of their income (about $1,500) for health insurance. The required payments reach so far down the scale that those who are living at the federal poverty level of $22,000 will have to shell out 2 percent of their totally inadequate incomes ($440) for insurance.

That Obama is charging premiums to those living at or on the border of poverty is absolutely incredible! And this from a candidate who pledged that he would not tax the middle class!

  If you have insurance, you will get hit by his proposed 40 percent tax on insurance premiums. 

When the tax — and the legislation — takes effect in 2013, all families making about $120,000 or more in combined household income (14 percent of all families or one in seven) will have to pay the tax.

By the next year, 2014, the tax will hit every family making more than $100,000 (about 18 percent of all families or one in six).

By 2019, 10 years hence, the tax will reach down to affect every family making more than $75,000 a year (31 percent of families or one in three).

  The tax will take 40 percent of all premiums above $21,000. 

So if you don't have insurance, you will be socked with a mandate to buy coverage and pay a hefty proportion of your income to do it; and if you have insurance, you will be hit with an excise tax on the coverage.

(In theory, it is the insurance companies that have to pay the tax, but the Senate Finance Committee “assumes” that they will pass the tax along to their policyholders).

These costs make a mockery of Obama's oft-repeated pledge to avoid any tax increase that would impact those making under $250,000 a year.

He finances about half of his health care plan on the backs of the elderly by cutting Medicare and inducing scarcity and the other half by premium taxes and insurance purchasing mandates on the middle and lower middle class.

To find out more about Dick Morris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 DICK MORRIS AND EILEEN MCGANN

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment

As a lifetime Republican (somewhat embarrassed to be at this time), I found this column to be lacking and inaccurate in several areas. Here is what I mean: 1. I know of no "Obama Healthcare Bill", just some guidelines from the Whitehouse and a number of bills in Congress. This sounds a lot like the current GOP tired/old rhetoric - "it is all Obama's fault". 2. There is no "better way" offered in this column. Just why what you wrote about is bad. 3. You call having people pay for or contribute to their health insurance "taxes". I guess everything that costs us money is taxes per the GOP now, even if it is not going to the government. 4. You did provide some good data I had not seen about "possible" costs for health care insurance. I actually thought these costs and the decreasing cost level based on lower income were quite reasonable. Much less than the approximately $13,000 a year my wife and I pay for our group insurance through the aerospace company I retired (early) from (and we are both in good health with household income under the $66K you had in your column). Your data did not show any comparison to what people who have insurance now pay, but implied (wrongly I think) that the numbers in your column were more. 5. I think you must have needed to meet a deadline, and didn't give this column enough attention to provide a reasoned, factual (or state what is not factual) opinion that recognizes the complexity of this issue, and at least provide some alternative. Try to do better to recognize complexities and offer alternatives in future columns and you will come off as more credible. Thanks, Dennis

Comment: #1
Posted by: Dennisdu
Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:12 AM

This is an addition to my previous comments on your opinion article that I forgot to add. Another "error" or at least misleading bit of information in your column was in stating what percentage of families will be at various income levels in 2013, 2014, or 2019. As you well know, incomes and population in the future will change, especially 10 years from now. Thus any percentage based on changing average income and changing number of families is only a prediction, or more likely in your column something based on today's numbers. This should be so stated. "Subsidies" for lower income families are the inverse of taxes. This should be recognized. Of course subsidies come from somewhere, ultimately taxes of either businesses or people (though some can come from the"bailout" loans interest I the government may get). Thanks, Dennis

Comment: #2
Posted by: Dennisdu
Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:30 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
Dick Morris
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 20 Mar 2010
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'ReillyUpdated 20 Mar 2010
Andy Borowitz
Andy BorowitzUpdated 20 Mar 2010

27 Oct 2008 What McCain has to do to Win

26 Aug 2009 Lieberman Opens the Door to Democratic Retreat

8 Oct 2008 The Obama-Ayers Connection